Calder High School and Review petition

Calder High School should not be confused with West Calder High School, Polbeth, West Calder, West Lothian. or Calder High School for Girls in Liverpool

The Calder High School is a comprehensive school, with an associated sixth form. It is located in the village of Mytholmroyd, in the metropolitan district of Calderdale, in northern England.

Contents 1 Admissions 2 History 2.1 Grammar school 2.2 Comprehensive 3 Buildings 4 Activities 5 Alumni 5.1 Hebden Bridge Grammar School 6 Accreditation 7 References 8 External links 8.1 News items

Admissions

As of the academic year 2006-7 it had 1,294 pupils. At the start of the 2010-1 term, Calder High had a total of 27 new teachers including the new Head Teacher Mrs Spillane.

It is situated in the middle of the village, north of the A646. History Grammar school

In the early 1950s, the school had around 350 boys and girls Comprehensive

Calder High opened in May 1952 as one of the first comprehensives in the country, replacing the older Hebden Bridge Grammar school. On 28 December 1969, Songs of Praise was shown from the school. By the 1970s it had 1200 boys and girls. Until April 1974, it was administered by the Calder Divisional Executive of West Riding County Council. In November 1994, thirteen-year-old Lindsay Rimer was murdered, which has not been solved. Buildings

In 1963, a new science block and bus bays were added. More recently, a new Sixth Form building was added and officially opened on 12 July 2004 by outgoing headteacher David Scott. At the start of the 2007 academic year, the Ted Hughes theater was opened and named under the consent of Ted Hughes's widow.

There was speculation about plans to rebuild the school on the present school field. Chris McCafferty MP said that this would only happen once Todmorden High School was rebuilt. On 11 December 2008, the school was visited by Nick Gibb MP (then shadow minister for schools) to discuss its rebuilding in the near future. During his visit, he became involved in a heated debate with a small group of students who challenged his negative views regarding comprehensive education and his advocation of a private sector role in schools. Activities

In October 2006, the school obtained a licence to run a week-long radio station, broadcast directly from the school. The radio was named Royd FM. The success of this project led to Royd FM broadcasting again in December 2007.

In January 2007 a student-run business was opened in school; Under the Stairs, selling snacks at break times and lunches.The two students - Matthew Dawson and Jack Walsh both received awards for their Entrepreneur skills.

Each year students of Calder High put on the Easter-time performance of the Pace Egg Play in the surrounding area. This is a very big hit with the locals, with thousands of people coming to see it from around the world. This year (2013) the play is being run by Thomas Jennings and Jack Deighton. Alumni Dario Coates, actor who plays Alex Neeson Stuart Fielden Jessica Harris (actress) Thomas Nelstrop Hebden Bridge Grammar School Paul Barker (writer), broadcaster, Editor from 1968-86 of New Society David Fletcher MBE, environmental campaigner Sir Bernard Ingham John Sowden, Chairman from 1972-80 of Costain Group Accreditation Technology College Training School

Review petition and Calder High School

In India, a binding decision of the Supreme Court/High Court can be reviewed in Review Petition. The parties aggrieved on any order of the Supreme Court on any apparent error can file a review petition. Taking into consideration the principle of stare decisis, courts generally do not unsettle a decision, without a strong case. This provision regarding review is an exemption to the legal principle of stare decisis.

Article 137 of the Constitution provides that subject to provisions of any law and rule made under Article 145 the Supreme Court of India has the power to review any judgement pronounced (or order made) by it. Under Supreme Court Rules, 1966 such a petition needs to be filed within 30 days from the date of judgement or order. It is also recommended that the petition should be circulated without oral arguments to the same bench of judges that delivered the judgement (or order) sought to be reviewed.

Furthermore, even after dismissal of a review petition, the SC may consider a curative petition in order to prevent abuse of its process and to cure gross miscarriage of justice.

While a civil review petition can be moved in accordance with Order XLVII, Rule 1(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 a criminal review petition can be moved only on the ground of an error apparent on the face of the record. (Source: CPC, 1908 and CRPC, 1973)

Contents 1 Prominent cases 1.1 2G spectrum scam 1.2 Vodafone-Hutchison Tax Case 1.3 Mayawati Disproportionate Assets case 2 See also 3 References

Prominent cases 2G spectrum scam Main article: 2G spectrum scam

On 2 March 2012, Govt of India filed a review petition in Supreme Court seeking partial review of the court's 2 February 2012 order which had quashed 122 licenses. The Govt questioned Supreme Court's authority over ruling against the first-come first-served policy but stayed away from challenging the cancellation of 122 licences issued during the tenure of A Raja as Telecom Minister. On the same day Sistema, majority shareholder in MTS India, too filed a review petition in Supreme Court. The Supreme Court on 4 April 2012 accepted Government's review petition on limited grounds and dismissed all other 10 review petitions. Vodafone-Hutchison Tax Case Further information: Vodafone Tax Case

On 17 February 2012, Govt of India moved the Supreme Court seeking a review of its verdict holding that the Indian Income Tax Department does not have jurisdiction to impose Rs.11,000 crore as tax on the overseas deal between Vodafone and Hutchison. On 20 March 2012, SC dismissed the review petition during an in-chamber proceeding saying the petition has no merit. Mayawati Disproportionate Assets case Further information: Mayawati#Disproportionate assets case

On 4 October 2012, based on a review petition filed by a person named Kamlesh Verma, the Supreme Court decided to review its earlier verdict in open court in a Disproportionate assets case against Mayawati. The case dates back to 2003 when CBI filed a case against Mayawati for owning assets disproportionate to her known sources of income. Mayawati described the CBI investigation against her as illegal. The assets case was finally quashed on 6 July 2012—nine years later—by the Supreme Court; the court found that the case was unwarranted. The CBI decided not to file an appeal. See also Curative petition
14+255 13 15 16